← Back

Inside the black box of AI: How AI models actually think | Emmanuel Ameisen (Anthropic)

· Product🎙️ Video/audio episode

Summary (from the publisher)

Listen now (72 mins) | Emmanuel Ameisen of Anthropic explains what looking inside language models reveals about planning, consciousness, and AI safety

This post is a recorded conversation, not a written article — the real content is the video/audio at the source. What follows is the show notes, not a transcript.

Show notes

Emmanuel Ameisen is an interpretability researcher at Anthropic, where he looks inside LLMs like Claude to understand how they think. Before joining Anthropic, he spent years in applied ML at Stripe and Insight, and is the author of Building Machine Learning Powered Applications. His research has produced some of the most striking findings in the field: that models form general representations of concepts, plan many tokens ahead without stating those plans explicitly, and may exhibit something structurally similar to the distinction between conscious and unconscious processing in humans.

Why the “next-token predictor” framing undersells how models actually plan and think

Why anthropomorphizing AI can actually be the right approach

The smooth scaling curve behind what look like sudden capability jumps

WorkOS—Make your app enterprise-ready, with SSO, SCIM, RBAC, and more

• Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361

• Head of Claude Code: What happens after coding is solved | Boris Cherny: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/head-of-claude-code-what-happens

• The Rise and Fall of Agent Civilizations: The whole OpenAI/Hugging Face story in plain English: https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/openai-huggingface

• The Utility of Interpretability — Emmanuel Ameisen, Anthropic: https://www.latent.space/p/circuit-tracing

• A Brief History of Intelligence: Evolution, AI, and the Five Breakthroughs That Made Our Brains: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0063286343

Watch/listen at lennysnewsletter.com ↗